Prediction of Joshua Goodger [821st] vs Michael Zhu [873rd] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L W W L
Form
W L L W W L L W W LHead-To-Head: Goodger 1 - 0 Zhu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Goodger winning 2 and Zhu winning 0. The last match between Goodger and Zhu was at the M25 Sunderland, 01-11-2023, First, I.hard with Joshua Goodger getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Joshua Goodger | 1 |
| Michael Zhu | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Joshua Goodger
Player
Michael Zhu
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:2:0 | Average Match Time | 1:2:0 |
| 67% (33/49) | 1st Serve % | 67% (33/49) |
| 79% (26/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (19/33) |
| 56% (9/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (6/16) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (24/49) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Joshua Goodger vs Michael Zhu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Goodger 1 - 0 Zhu
Editorial Prediction:
Joshua Goodger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Joshua Goodger
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Barnaby Smith
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
18
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(6) 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Ying Hou
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Demetris Azoides
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Loxley
Player
Joshua Goodger
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 7-6(3) 11-9 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Joshua Goodger
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
David Quayle
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 7-6(2) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Joshua Goodger
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Zhu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Opitz
Player
Michael Zhu
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
80%
(
66 of
82)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 5-7 15-13 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michael Zhu
Player
Alexander Lauinger
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Leonardo Cattaneo
Player
Michael Zhu
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alberto Bronzetti
Player
Michael Zhu
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Zhu
Player
Faris Zakaryia
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Zhu
Player
Alexander Krylov
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Michael Zhu
76%
(
66 of
87)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aoran Wang
Player
Michael Zhu
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
15
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
89%
(
41 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Zhu
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
12
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48% (40/44) | Win/Loss | 52% (249/234) |
| 49% (96/99) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (559/536) |
| 50% (967/952) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5052/4932) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 266 | Aces Total | 378 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 124 | Total Double Faults | 741 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:4:49 |
| 273.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 392.22 |
| 60% (2045/3422) | 1st Serve % | 66% (13580/20618) |
| 71% (1452/2045) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (8205/13580) |
| 50% (694/1377) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3365/7037) |
| 39% (99/254) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (883/1949) |
| 36% (1167/3244) | Return Points Win % | 40% (8043/19924) |
| 48% (40/84) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (246/477) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 40% (12/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (40/72) |
| 41% (11/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (69/131) |
| 77% (44/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (252/214) |
| 23% (44/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (252/37) |
| 15% (40/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (231/34) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
